|
Download Printable PDF
1. A
Brief Look At Christianity For The 21st Century:
A Personal Journey
by
Dick Rauscher
Abstract
This
article is an attempt to briefly explore the intellectual and
spiritual path that I have been walking for the last sixty
years. It is not meant to be the final word on my understanding
of God, nor is it meant to represent THE truth. Like all of
us, I continue to grow and awaken spiritually each day. This
article simply reflects what currently makes sense to me as
an ordained pastor of the Christian Church at this point in
my spiritual journey as I struggle to spiritually awaken.
|
Who made the
world?
Who made the swan, and the black bear?
Who made the grasshopper?
This grasshopper, I mean-
the one who has flung herself out of the grass,
the one who is eating sugar out of my hand,
who is moving her jaws back and forth instead of up and down-
who is gazing around with her enormous and complicated eyes.
Now she lifts her pale forearms and thoroughly washes her face.
Now she snaps her wings open, and floats away.
I don't know exactly what a prayer is.
I do know how to pay attention,
how to fall down into the grass,
how to kneel down in the grass,
how to be idle and blessed,
how to stroll through the fields,
which is what I have been doing all day.
Tell me, what else should I have done?
Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon?
Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?
The Summer Day by Mary Oliver
INTRODUCTION
Many years of formal
study in the fields of psychotherapy and spirituality, and six decades
of life journey as a human-becoming, have profoundly changed my understandings
of Self, God, and what it means to live a spiritually awakened life.
I believe a person is spiritually awakened when they have incorporated
the spiritual disciplines to live fully in the moment, and have developed
a heart that is open to a sense of the sacred. A person who is spiritually
awakened has the ability to accept the reality of what is, and is able
to internally challenge and explore the many ego beliefs, assumptions,
certainties, and expectations that they have unconsciously accumulated
over the course of their life. The goal of such exploration is to empty
the ego and simply be. A spiritually awakened person lives life in
the knowledge that all of one's accumulated words and beliefs are only
relative metaphors and concepts that talk about reality; they do not
ultimately define reality. For a person who is spiritually awakened,
reality can only be experienced.
This article is an
attempt to briefly explore the intellectual and spiritual path that
I have been walking for the last sixty years. It is not meant to be
the final word on my understanding of God, nor is it meant to represent
THE truth. Like all of us, I continue to grow and awaken spiritually
each day. This article simply reflects what currently makes sense to
me as an ordained pastor of the Christian Church at this point in my
spiritual journey as I struggle to spiritually awaken.
Many of the ideas
presented in this article are not original to me. They are the result
of many years of study and reflection. Where I can, I give credit and
reference to the source. To those ideas whose sources are lost in the
misty years of study, I give thanks that so many great minds have shared
their thoughts with me.
The writings of Jesus
Seminar scholars and theologians such as Bishop John Shelby Spong,
Marcus Borg, Burton Mack, Robert Funk, John Dominic Crossan, Karen
King, and Russell Shorto and others, have been very helpful in my attempts
to clarify and articulate what I do believe about God and the Christian
tradition today. Anthony DeMello, Catherine de Hueck Doherty, Barbara
Marx Hubbard, and James Carse are all seminal writers who have opened
my mind and heart to exciting new realities. These are but a few of
the more important mentors that journeyed with me over the years and
encouraged my awakening. I am deeply indebted to their wisdom.
Most of the models
and charts in this paper are of my own creation and design. I have
learned over the years that my mind works best with visual and poetic
ways of exploring and presenting ideas. In this paper I will use both
verbal explanations and my visual models to more clearly present the
ideas discussed. The poetry will help to give the words a soul.
The God I speak about
in this paper is not the theistic God of the Christian tradition that
lives in heaven and keeps tabs on each of his children, but it is the
God of creation, the compassionate God of the ancient mystics, and
the Sacred Spirit worshiped by the Shamans since the dawn of human
culture. I will be talking about a post modern 21st century God in
whom I have found the rich meaning and spiritual depth that I have
been searching for most of my life; a 21st century God who has grown
beyond the limits and confines of primitive theological beliefs.
I, like many non-church
going Christians that Bishop Spong refers to as The Christian Alumni
Association, spent years wrestling with the primitive, literal, pre-modern
God of the Christian Church. It left me wounded and disillusioned.
The growing movement toward literalistic, right wing, conservative
Christian beliefs left me without a faith I could embrace without committing
intellectual suicide.
Because being publicly
identified as an ordained Christian pastor has increasingly become
an embarrassment, given that "Christian" in our current culture has
become increasingly identified with conservative or fundamentalist
theology, my search for a deeper spirituality has often been a solitary
journey.
I will begin with
a brief description of my spiritual journey over the last five decades
and conclude with a brief summary of my spiritual home today. I trust
that my spiritual journey will continue.
One day you
finally knew
What you had to do, and began,
Though the voices around you
Kept shouting
Their bad advice-----
Though the whole house
Began to tremble
And you felt the old tug
At your ankles.
"Mend my life!"
each voice cried.
But you didn't stop.
You knew what you had to do,
Though the wind pried with its stiff fingers
At the very foundations----
Though their melancholy Was terrible.
It was already late enough,
and a wild night,
And the road full of fallen
Branches and stones.
But little by little, as you left their voices behind,
The stars began to burn
Through the sheets of clouds,
And there was a new voice,
Which you slowly
Recognized as your own,
That kept you company
As you strode deeper and deeper
Into the world,
Determined to do
The only thing you could do----
Determined to save
The only live you could save.
The Journey: By Mary Oliver
THE JOURNEY TOWARD
A FAITH: THE PRIMITIVE GOD OF CHILDHOOD
To understand the
primitive God of my childhood it is first necessary to understand the
emotional and developmental stages we all pass through on our journey
to adulthood. The first developmental stage is called childhood. It
is sometimes referred to as a time of pre-critical naiveté. In other
words, children are simple and gullible. This is not a judgmental statement,
simply a statement of fact. As children we are simple in the sense
that we keep the world safe by splitting everything into categories
of good and bad, safe and unsafe, pain and pleasure, and right and
wrong. Splitting is a therapeutic term that refers to "black-and-white" , "either
- or", and "all-or-nothing" thinking.
Splitting is a very
helpful way of understanding the world when we are children. It keeps
things simple and understandable for us. However, this primitive childhood
all or nothing, black or white way of thinking is very concrete and
leaves little or no room for ambiguity, diversity, inclusiveness, or
tolerance. In other words, there is no gray in black and white thinking.
When this primitive dualistic thinking process is carried into adulthood,
the result is a tendency towards judgment and criticism, and it often
leads us to create harsh categories of "otherness" so we can comfortably
segregate and label those who do not agree with us.
We create these judgmental
labels for others because we believe ourselves to be white, right,
and good. It is important to remember when we use black and white thinking,
we only have two positions to work with; right and wrong. Since we
rarely choose to assume we are wrong, when others inevitably disagree
with us, they are usually experienced as wrong. Black and white thinking
is often referred to as dualistic thinking.
It is virtually impossible
to be a dualistic thinker and not be opinionated and judgmental. Others
either agree with us, or they are wrong. Since judgment is typically
experienced as critical and hurtful, others can quickly become defensive.
When this happens, conflict is inevitable.
To state this concept
simply, our ego has a great investment in being right. It likes to
think that it is the center of the universe. The greater our ego's
investment in being right, the more tendency there is for us to become
a rigid black and white thinker. In others words, the greater our investment
in being right, the greater the potential exists for us to create conflict
with others. See chart #1 below.

It is
important to understand that every issue needs people who are able
to go to both of the fringes and articulate for us the truths that
are found there. These people provide us with the invaluable perspectives
that come from the extreme fringes of the issue. The problem emerges
when one side or the other believes that they alone are the bearers
of THE truth; the absolute truth. It is necessary to understand that
there is truth in both positions. When we stop searching for the truth
in the other persons point of view, we slide quickly into black and
white thinking. The inevitable result is conflict; a holy war to proselytize
THE truth that only they possess. Until we become God, all truth is
relative truth. All truth is gray.
Children
are gullible in that they believe without question what their caretakers
and the adults in their lives tell them. As a child I had no trouble
believing that all the things of the bible were true and factual. It
took a faith in my caretakers for me to believe them, but it did not
take a faith in the Christian tradition for me to believe that Jesus
actually walked on water, was born of a virgin, that a miraculous star
appeared in the east, that angels appeared to the shepherds, and that
Jesus bodily rose on the third day after his crucifixion.
It would
not have occurred to me to question the validity or factuality of these
biblical stories. As a child, using a simplistic all or nothing, black
and white thinking process, things were either true or not true. Adults
said they were true. I simply believed them.
As a
child, I hated going to church. I had to take the bus since most Sundays
my parents slept in because it was their day of rest from work. Sunday
school was held in a very dark room in the basement of the church.
There was only one small stained glass window in the room. It was protected
by a rusty steel mesh grating that was bolted into the stone wall.
It was damp and musty.
In Sunday
school I was taught that being a Christian meant I was supposed to
be good and believe in Jesus. I was also taught that I had been born
a bad person, and that without Jesus' help I could never be good. These
teachers taught me that Jesus had been sacrificed by God on a cross
and that his blood could somehow take away my badness. I never did
really understand how that worked.
Sunday
school teachers told me that God, who was definitely male, was "out
there somewhere in heaven, sitting on a big throne and keeping tabs
on me". They assured me however, that if I prayed hard enough, and
had enough faith, God would do what ever I needed Him to do. If God
didn't do what I asked Him to do, it meant that either I wasn't praying
hard enough, or that I didn't have enough faith. I was afraid of God,
but I felt ashamed because my Santa Clause God was obviously not doing
what I wanted him to do. I was taught that the reward for being a good
Christian was heaven and that Jesus was the only way to heaven. If
you weren't Christian, you were going to hell. It didn't seem fair
to everyone else, but I didn't question it. I learned that making loud
noises and laughing in church was disrespectful to God. God got angry
when He wasn't respected. At the same time, the Sunday school teachers
told me that it was grace that would get me to heaven, not how good
I could be. It was pretty confusing, but they obviously knew what they
were talking about. I assumed I just didn't understand it yet.
What
amazes me today is that I didn't begin to seriously question these
religious beliefs until I was well into adulthood. It took me many
years to learn to pay attention to my accumulated beliefs; to understand
that my beliefs are not reality. Over the years, I have learned that
the world is round whether I believe it---or not.
Today
I understand that my beliefs are only relative truths, not absolute
truths. So now, I work hard to identify my beliefs, and when I discover
them, I question them very carefully. They define who I am and how
I behave in the world. Whether my beliefs are conscious or unconscious,
they have the power to create pain and suffering, and they have the
power to bring compassion. The choice is mine, but only if my beliefs
are conscious. I am thankful that today my world is slowly getting
grayer.
THE
GOD OF MY ADOLESCENCE: THE BEGINNING OF CRITICAL THINKING and THE
JOURNEY INTO ADULTHOOD:
I'd
been taught that everything in the Bible was not only literally true,
but that it came directly from God. Therefore the Bible and Christian
faith could not be questioned.
When
I entered late childhood and adolescence, I entered a stage of life
called critical thinking. Outside of my awareness, I was now beginning
to unconsciously question what my teachers and parents had taught me.
Much of what I had learned about Christianity from my Sunday school
teachers just didn't make sense.
How
could Jonah have survived in the belly of a whale? That was ridiculous.
How could Mary have been a virgin? There was only one way to get pregnant.
Either Mary lied or whoever wrote it down was pretty naive. And why
would God insist that we kill homosexuals? One of my friends was gay.
It didn't make sense.
As far
as the Garden of Eden was concerned, I felt bad enough about myself,
I didn't need God telling me I was bad too. How could I have sinned
before I was even born. I decided that Jesus was ok, but religion was
stupid and God was stupid.
Over
time, I eventually discarded most of what I had been taught. When pressed
I would agree that I believed in a God, but probably not in the God
of the Christian tradition. I was very vague about my beliefs for many
years. Life continued.
I graduated
in 1962 with a bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering from Clarkson
University. Ten years later I left my job in manufacturing management.
I wasn't sure where I was going but I was finally able to admit to
myself that working as an engineer was not what I wanted to do with
my life. I was intrigued by the writings of the homesteaders and naturalists
Scott and Helen Nearing.
Although
I wouldn't have described them as such, the Nearings were clearly my
spiritual guides during much of the early 1970's. I fell in love with
the call to a simpler life. I moved my family to Naples, NY, bought
27 acres of land, and for the next five years we lived off the land
as a craftsman / homesteader. We milked goats, raised pigs, had our
own chickens and turkeys, and grew virtually all of our own food. I
built my own home and barns from rough sawn lumber. And like the Nearings,
I built field-stone walls and field-stone foundations for the buildings.
In between the homesteading and silversmithing I learned to play the
tenor banjo.
Despite
five hard working years as a self sufficient homesteader and craftsman,
it felt like my life was pretty much a failure. My world was a pretty
barren place and my life certainly lacked personal meaning. I was bored
and more than a little depressed.
Without
knowing it, my spiritual rebirthing and journey back to God had begun.
I understand today, there is no spiritual birthing without pain, and
that an awakened, authentic spirituality is a lifetime journey. But
at the time, because I was stuck in the stage of critical thinking
that had rejected most of what I had been taught in childhood, I was
convinced that I wasn't a real Christian. The birthing process had
started, but I had a long way to go.
Throughout
the 70's, the painful loneliness of childhood and the compelling childhood
need to belong and be in community continued to manifest itself in
a strong attraction to be part of the Christian Church. The inner conflict
over my faith had long since disappeared from my consciousness, but
I couldn't stop thinking about God. I played the organ in a Roman Catholic
Church for a while. I went to various Christian renewal programs over
the years. I spent a lot of time with people who claimed to be real
Christians, but inside I felt guilty. I felt like a phony, because
at some level of awareness I knew I wasn't a real Christian. Real Christians
believed. I couldn't.
After
five years of living the simple life as a homesteader, I knew that
I needed to resolve the inner conflict. The struggle between my lack
of faith as a Christian and my need to "belong" could no longer be
ignored. The quiet call to a more spiritual life began to invade my
awareness like a gentle wind blowing fall leaves across the dry barren
ground of my life. I was beginning to awaken. My soul was stirring.
In the
fall of 1978 I visited Colgate Rochester Divinity "just to see what
a seminary looked like". It was a seminal event in my life. When I
opened the door began to walk the halls toward the registrars office,
I knew that I had, in some very strange way, come home.
I began
my seminary education that Spring. I made friends with some of the
more conservative students in my class. I guess I was hoping that some
of their faith would rub off on me. They rose to the challenge, but
despite many hours of theological debate over uncounted cups of coffee,
I remained unconvinced. It still didn't make a lot of sense, but the
crisis was averted when it became clear that I was being called to
a pastoral counseling ministry.
I began
my formal training and certification as a Pastoral Counselor in the
American Association of Pastoral Counselors in the early 1980's. It
was a path of training, supervision, and personal therapy that would
define my life journey for the next 20 years. I received a seminary
education, but my faith beliefs were secondary to my education in psychotherapy
and pastoral counseling. The inner conflicts over my faith and religious
beliefs were put on hold for another ten years.
In 1987
I was ordained an Elder in the United Methodist Church, served as a
Chaplain/Counselor at a local college, opened a private practice in
pastoral psychotherapy, and eventually became a certified Fellow in
the American Association of Pastoral Counselors. I served eight years
on the North Central United Methodist Board of Ordained Ministry but
I often found myself avoiding my clergy colleagues because I felt alienated.
I didn't feel like I belonged. The conflict hadn't gone away.
Despite
years of seminary training, theological studies, and efforts to become
an ordained Christian Pastor, I still could not fully believe in the
Christian doctrines and Christian theology. I was unable to pray publicly
to a theistic God that I didn't believe existed. To do so felt too
hypocritical. It was actually embarrassing to me to admit through public
prayer that I actually believed in such a God.
I was
out of Egypt but I was still wandering in a dry and barren desert looking
for my spiritual home. It was a lonely time of isolation and alienation
from the Christian community, and most of the time I felt the gnawing
shame and pain of failure. In hindsight, I can see clearly that it
was simply the lonely pain of yet another spiritual birthing in my
life journey.
"Our metaphors
go on ahead of us. They know before we do. And thank goodness
for that, for if I were dependent on other ways of coming to
knowledge I think I'd be a very slow study. I need something
to serve as a container for emotion and idea, a vessel that can
hold what's too slippery, or charged or difficult to touch. Will
doesn't have much to do with this, I can't choose what's going
to serve as a compelling image for me. But I've learned to trust
that part of the imagination that gropes forward, feeling for
what it needs; to watch for fascination, for signs of compelled
attention (look at me, something seems to say, closely ) that
indicates there's something I need to attend to.
I almost always
begin with description, as a way of focusing on that compelling
image, the poem's "given". I know that what I see is just the
proverbial tip of the iceberg; if I do my work of study and examination,
and if I am lucky, the image will become a metaphor, will yield
depth and meaning, will lead me to insight. The goal here is
inquiry."
By poet Mark Doty
POST-CRITICAL
NAIVETÉ: SPIRITUAL MATURITY:
After a decade in
formal pastoral counseling training and ministry I realized that I
was not going to find the spirituality that had called me into ministry
in the religious beliefs of the institutional Christian church. I was
unable to define what I meant by spirituality, but I knew it had to
do with silence, simplicity, listening, and living in the moment.
I began to study
Buddhist psychology and meditation. As I studied the Buddhist teachers
and learned about Buddhist and eastern concepts of emptiness, I began
to see how the conflict created by the primitive dualistic thinking
process of the Christian faith and black and white thinking, in general,
was so intrinsically caustic to the ideas of non-violence and world
peace.
As I pointed out
earlier, there is no way to avoid the judgment, or the pain and suffering
that emerges from dualistic thinking. Some one has to be white, right
and good. Someone therefore has to be black, bad, and wrong. When there
are only two colors to work with i.e. black and white, the battle for
right, white, and good automatically leads to conflict. The Christian
belief that Jesus is the only true path to God is a dualistic belief
that can only lead to painful conflict with anyone who walks a different
path toward the Creator. Anyone who even questions the fundamental
beliefs of Christianity is very quickly labeled as wrong and often
defined as evil.
Unfortunately, primitive
dualistic thinking permeates our human culture. Examples of such thinking
is endless; Pakistan vs. India, the United States vs. the Soviet Union,
Israel vs. Palestine, the black vs. white of racism, the male vs. female
of sexism, rich vs. poor, educated western cultures vs. uneducated
third world cultures, teacher vs. student, Republicans vs. Democrats,
adults vs. children, homosexual vs. heterosexual, abortion vs. right
to life..the list is endless. The pain and suffering caused by primitive
dualistic thinking is endless.
As I studied the
spiritual lives of Martin Luther King, Ghandi, Jesus, Buddha, Nelson
Mandela, Mother Theresa, and others I learned that they all encouraged
us to live lives based on the principle of non-violence. These spiritual
teachers taught me that any human belief that builds walls that create
an us-versus-them "otherness", is inherently caustic to compassionate
communities and world peace. Put simply, categories of "otherness" created
by dualistic thinking inevitably leads to violence.
Over time, I came
to understand that it is only thru unity, diversity, oneness, and the
ego emptiness of the middlepath we will encounter peace and compassion.
The ego needs to be right. The ego that needs to be right will create
conflict and suffering. The ego that has emptied itself of the need
to be right can create compassion.
Until we learn to
empty our ego of it's beliefs and certainties, the roots of conflict
and suffering will reside in our own hearts. This emptying of ego certainties
is what I call the emptiness of middlepath theology. Middlepath spirituality
is experiential. It can only be experienced in the moment.
Middlepath spirituality
can often be seen more clearly in Pagan, Native American, and Buddhist
religious cultures where all of creation is considered sacred; where
all of creation contains Spirit. There is less focus on dualistic categories
of sacred and secular. The theology of these religions tends to be
more focused on gratitude and simply learning to pay attention to the
sacredness of each moment.

The
more our ego can learn to empty itself, the more we will find ourselves
walking the middlepath. The middlepath is not a thing to achieve. It
doesn't actually exist. It simply is. One does not do compassion. One
simply is compassion.
Over
time, I came to understand that I could only find God on the middle
path in the gray between black and white thinking As I struggled to
intentionally integrate spirituality and psychotherapy, I began little
by little to construct a God that would be found on the middlepath.
A God that is middlepath.. It was deeply satisfying to me that the
God of the middlepath was a God I could intellectually believe in and
worship without reservation. See Diagram #2 below.

My life
long struggle to believe in a Christian tradition that had THE truth
and believed Jesus was THE only path to salvation was over. It not
only didn't make sense to me any longer, it was actually the antithesis
of what I now believed. I could not find the God of the Christian tradition
on the middlepath. In fact, I began to understand that the God of the
orthodox Christian church was an institutionalized God of black and
white thinking; who throughout history has been a religious source
of much violence, judgment, conflict, pain and suffering! This primitive,
black and white God of judgment and suffering is manifest clearly in
the teachings of all fundamentalist religions. The God of the Christian
tradition is a God that has been created by human egos. For me, this
God is dead.
All fundamentalism
is by definition, primitive black and white thinking .Diversity,
inclusiveness, change, and openness to modern theological interpretation
for the post- modern world is not allowed.
The
one thing I became certain about was that any religion that claimed
to be or have THE truth was the antithesis of what my middlepath God
and Jesus were all about. I was an ordained pastor in the Methodist
Church but I knew in my heart that I would never again struggle to
be an orthodox Christian.
Jesus'
ministry was about justice and breaking down the ego created barriers
that separated people whether it was the purity laws of the Jewish
temple, the boundaries that were built inside families, or the boundaries
that separated tax collectors, prostitutes, and women in general. Jesus
systematically tore down the barriers that created any sense of us
versus them categories. I believe Jesus was clearly calling us to live
on the middlepath. He called it the Kingdom of God where everyone is
simply a child of God. A kingdom where every thing and every one is
created by God and therefore sacred. A kingdom where God's generosity,
love and compassion were unlimited.
For
most of the 90's I avoided telling people that I was an ordained pastor.
I referred to myself as a Christian Buddhist, because , as I said earlier,
I was deeply embarrassed to admit that I was a pastor of the dualistic,
exclusivistic and literalistic beliefs of the orthodox Christian church.
I was clearly a clergy member of The Christian Alumni Association.
My self-identity
confusion grew into a crisis. Was I a Christian Buddhist? What did
that mean? Should I just quit the Christian ministry? Should I openly
challenge the Church? Should I simply be a pastoral counselor in private
practice? I continued to study and grapple with the integration of
psychotherapy and spirituality. I began attending workshops and seminars
with others who were also working to find ways to bring these two disciplines
together.
In the
mid 90's I founded the Stonyhill Institute of Spirituality and Psychotherapy
to begin a formal exploration into the integration of spirituality
and psychotherapy. If walking the middlepath requires emptying the
ego of it's beliefs and certainties, then spiritual growth is inherently
grounded in psychological growth and increased self-awareness. Stated
simply, there is no spiritual growth without an increase in self-awareness.
In other words, to walk the middlepath requires that one have deep
insight and personal self-awareness.
I began
writing about middlepath theology and published my articles on my website
(www.stonyhill.com). I had cracked the theological door, but I was
still in my theological closet. I hadn't come out yet. I was increasingly
uncomfortable with the "self" I showed to the world. I was pastoral
psychotherapist helping clients learn how to live authentic lives and
I was not living authentically myself. The inner conflict and struggle
intensified.
The
confusion continued until about five years ago when I began reading
books and articles published by biblical scholars working with the
Jesus Seminar. It was a revelation! Here were world class biblical
scholars who were saying what I had believed for most of my life! For
the first time I not only had the middlepath words and concepts to
clearly articulate the middlepath theology that I believed in, I now
had the emotional and intellectual support of others who were also
struggling to re-vision the orthodox Christian tradition.
I wasn't
alone!
I learned
that Jesus Seminar theologians like Marcus Borg, Robert Funk, Karen
King , John Crossan, Bishop John S. Spong, Walter Wink, and hundreds
of others were publishing books and articles based on modern biblical
scholarship calling for a re-visioning of the Christian faith. In fact,
they were saying that a re-visioning of Christianity is essential or
the Christian religion will eventually become another irrelevant religion
of human history.
Biblical
scholarship by world class theologians and scholars who have been searching
for the historical Jesus for over 15 years are now systematically challenging
the literalizing of what were obviously historical metaphors! Their
research and scholarship to discover the historical Jesus is showing
clearly that for over 2000 years we have "metaphorized our history
and then literalized our metaphors" into a Christian theology and tradition.
A theology and religion based on the primitive beliefs that a barbaric
human blood sacrifice had somehow appeased the God of the Christian
Church.
I now
had a way of returning to my Christian roots. As I read the books and
articles that were being published by the Jesus Seminar, the Christian
bible and Christian traditions were, for the first time, becoming a
source of truth for me. Only this time the truth was not literal, it
was embedded in metaphor and story. I could now read the bible like
a shaman. "I don't know if it actually happened this way, but I know
this story to be true." Scripture now was a lens that I could use to
discover the sacred here and now in my own life. The words and stories
in the bible were simply human records of how others had discovered
God in their lives.
What
is clear to me after more than two decades of study and spiritual growth
is that our Christian understanding of God must come off of the fringes
of black and white thinking and find it's place securely in the grayness
of the middle path; a place of emptiness, not knowing, paradox and
deep listening to the silence.
Only
then will we hear the still small voice of God whispering music from
our souls.
COMING
OUT OF THE CLOSET: SPIRITUAL MATURITY
There
is a growing truth for me in the words of T.S.Elliot who reminds me
that there is really nothing to fear from our spiritual struggles because
at the end of all our personal explorations, we will arrive back at
the self we started from and know in our hearts that we finally belong
there.
The
same seems to be true for my own personal explorations of God. I began
my life journey as a Christian in childhood. I was ordained as an Elder
in the United Methodist Church. I wrestled for many years with Christian
theology. And today, as a Christian-Buddhist I find myself back where
I began my journey; simply a child of God., But, like Jacob, without
the struggle I would never have found the spiritual peace that I enjoy
today.
So how
has the journey back to where I began changed me?
I still
consider myself a Christian, but I am now deeply non-exclusivist in
my Christian theological beliefs. Christianity is only one path to
the Creator. It is not the only path. As the mystics say, there are
many wells, but there is only one River of Life.
Secondly,
I no longer believe in a literal interpretation of the Christian biblical
tradition. I now understand the Christian biblical stories to be simply
profound sources of metaphoric truths.
And
lastly, I find myself taking the words of the historical Jesus much
more seriously today than I did as a younger Christian. I find myself
increasingly pacifist in my search for peace and justice. I believe
that the social and economic inequities that breed angry conflict,
unrest and terrorism must be replaced with compassion. "Do unto others" needs
to become a global way of life, not just an empty feel good quotation
from scripture.
I no
longer believe that Jesus is going to come to "save" us from our own
actions and choices. Jesus has shown us what must be done and what
it means to live a compassionate life. It is now our responsibility
to create a compassionate world. God is incarnate in all of us, not
just in Jesus. We have the gift of consciousness. I deeply believe
that it is now our responsibility to become co-creators with God. Spirit
will guide us but the responsibility of on-going creation is ours.
In the words of Barbara Marx Hubbard, we can no longer embrace the
pro-creation, survival of the fittest model of human evolution that
has existed for millennia, we must now become co-creators and embrace
a conscious evolutionary path for humanity. We must learn to walk the
middlepath.
Walking
the middlepath is no longer an option. We are no longer fighting with
spears and bows and arrows. The people who use black and white dualistic
thinking in the 21st century now have weapons of mass destruction with
the ability to destroy the planet we live on. The World Trade Towers
was a violent reminder that, for many people around the world, there
is nothing to lose by the use of terrorism, and perhaps, much to gain.
They are not "the evil ones". They are the disenfranchised. They are
the powerless ones. We unconsciously helped to create them. We can
no longer afford to be blind to our participation in the politics of
inequity. We must learn to evolve consciously. We must learn to walk
the middlepath.
We are
rapidly becoming a global community, but we are not yet a compassionate
global culture. We must learn to develop more compassionate and caring
ways of living together on this earth we call home. We are not yet
willing to see the suffering of people in other countries and cultures
as our problem. We must learn to walk the middlepath.
I am
convinced that unless we return to the metaphoric truths of Christian
tradition and give up the need to believe in the literal interpretation
and inerrancy of ancient primitive stories and beliefs, the Christian
Alumni Association will continue to grow, and the main line Christian
Churches will continue to wither and die.
In the
early years of the Christian church, people struggled to put into words
the holiness and the presence of God that they experienced in the person
called Jesus of Nazareth. For 2000 years the Christian Church has struggled
to hold onto power by literalizing the metaphoric stories and words
of these early gospel writers. What would it mean to go back once again
to the words and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth? What would it mean
to understand that the Christ of faith is simply 2000 years of accumulated
tradition that has been turned into inerrant holy scriptures and creeds.
I believe
that the Christian church is at the crossroads of the most important
decision it has ever had to make; to defend a dying primitive theology
that no longer has the ability to speak to a post-modern 21st century
culture, or journey forward into an unknown world of the 21st century
with the courage to embrace the words of all our great spiritual leaders
such as Buddha, Ghandi, Martin Luther King, and Jesus of Nazareth,
and listen closely to what they tried to teach us. To walk the middlepath
they all call us to walk will require that we empty our ego's of most
of our 2000 years of accumulated traditions and beliefs and go back
with an attitude of not knowing to the teachings of these great teachers
who all tried to point us to God. They all taught that the only path
to God is the middlepath of tolerance, non-violence, inclusiveness,
and compassion. Whether the Christian tradition
becomes a dead theology or a vital spirituality that can lead us into
the global culture of the third millennium is still up in the air.
The
choice is ours. History will tell us whether we had the courage to
spiritually awaken and live consciously on the middlepath.
CONCLUSION
AND A BRIEF SUMMARY: WHERE DO I GO FROM HERE? WHAT DOES BEING A CHRISTIAN
MEAN TO ME?
The
only spirituality that makes sense to me at this point in my life journey
is a middlepath spirituality based on unity, emptiness, silence, listening,
non-violence, tolerance, diversity, uncertainty, and not-knowing as
described below. (See the Appendix and Diagram #2).
For
me, the middlepath is spirituality. However, it is necessary to understand
that the middlepath is not something to believe in, it is not something
to achieve, it is simply a conscious way of seeing and thinking. It
is gray. It is non-violent. It is compassion. It simply is.
I can
no longer support or believe in a religion that, through its core teachings
of exclusivity, espouses the tenants of fundamentalist black and white
thinking. There are many wells, but there is only one river. Christianity
is only one way of understanding God. Jesus told me to love myself,
to love others, and to love God. Period. He did not say love others
unless they are ____________, or love them when they _____________.
Like
all the great spiritual teachers of history, Jesus taught us to walk
the middlepath; a path of love and compassion. He taught us to tear
down the walls built by our own egos; walls that separate us from one
another and create labels and categories of "otherness". He taught
that the dualistic beliefs that create these walls are the source of
judgment, intolerance, injustice, and suffering. He taught that we
are simply all children of God. If we are to call ourselves Christians
we must not "believe" in Jesus, we must listen carefully to the words
and teachings of the historical Jesus and take them seriously
Thus,
it no longer makes sense for me to support any political, religious,
social, cultural, or nationalistic beliefs or ideologies that are not
grounded on middlepath principles. I can no longer support dualistic
beliefs or ideologies that support splitting and judgmental categories
of "otherness" that lead to violence, conflict, and suffering.
The
10th grade textbook for one of the five required religion classes taught
in all Saudi public schools states: "It is compulsory for the Muslims
to be loyal to each other and to consider the infidels their enemy".
These children are being taught intolerance. They must be taught tolerance
and diversity.
Western
Christian education teaches children about the inerrancy of the Bible
and that the true church is a body of believers who worship Jesus as
the only path to heaven, and that he will return to create his reign.
These children are being taught intolerance. They must be taught tolerance
and diversity.
Intolerance
is intolerance, no matter where it is found. Human do not possess absolute
truth. We can believe and have faith in whatever religion makes sense
to us, but we must understand that it is simply our faith. It is a
relative truth only. Others will need to find their path. And whatever
that path may be, it too will only be a relative truth. Because all
things in creation are sacred, there is truth is all things. All faiths
are found on the middlepath because all faith paths lead to God.
In the words
of Rev. John S. Spong
I experience God as the source of life in the act
of living fully.
I experience God as the source of love in the act of loving wastefully.
I experience God as the Ground of being in the act of having the courage
to be.
I serve the God that I meet in Jesus, not by trying to convert others
to my way of believing, but by seeking to transform the world so that
every person might have that God-like capacity to live fully, to love
wastefully and to be all that each person can be.
Difference
is the essence of thought.
For Jesus, "the
kingdom of God was a realm without social boundaries, a kingdom
where there was neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave
nor free, homosexual nor heterosexual. I am a Christian because
I am a follower of Jesus. Although I do not believe his is
the only way, it is my way to live and to relate to God. Jesus
is my gift from God: pointing the way, affirming the good,
and breaking down the walls that divide.
As a human being,
I am radically finite. I am infinitely in the process of becoming.
As I grow, I will not "get there". To "get there" would be to become
God. There will always be more that I can become. But with every step
forward in my spiritual journey, I transcend who I was, and at the
same time I bring with me the person that I was before the transformation.
With every step, I find myself walking more and more on the sacred
ground of the middlepath. This is the infinite process of my becoming.
In this way I become
who I was created to be, but I never stop being who I am. In this way
we all become who we were created to be, but we never stop being who
we are.
As Thomas Sheehan
says in this article From Divinity to Infinity,
"There is
no place in the universe that we are not at home. There is
no tree in the Garden of Eden whose fruit we cannot eat. Every
step we take forward is answered by the horizon moving a step
backward. All we perform are endless acts of self-transcendence;
and in that way we endlessly humanize the world, learning to
be at home every where with it."
I am finally finding
my place within the Christian tradition. It is not a place of literal
truth, but it is a place filled to overflowing with relative truths
about a God that continues to stay behind the horizon as my spiritual
journey unfolds. With each step that I take on this spiritual journey,
I find myself walking more and more consciously on the middlepath.
Anthony DeMello and other mystics call this waking up. As a Buddhist
friend of mine says "Wake up my friend, your dying"! "May I be fully
awake and alive when I die".
I will never see
over the horizon, but the compassionate middlepath is a much more gentle
and loving path than the black and white path of my childhood.
"Our deepest
fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that
we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness
that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant,
gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to
be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve
the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking, So
that other people won't feel insecure around you.
We
were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within
us. It is not just in some of us; it is in everyone. As we
let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people
permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own
fear, Our presence automatically liberates others."
Nelson Mandela's Inaugural speech adopted from Marianne Williamson
I have
met many pastors who are themselves struggling with the current conservative
Christian theology demanded by their parishioners. They know that the
old metaphors can no longer be interpreted literally to a post-modern
educated congregation. Unfortunately these pastors are very limited
in what they can openly talk about since they and their families depend
on a church income. Often, they are literally forbidden in many churches,
by what is often a small conservative minority, to explore a more contemporary
liturgy and theology.
I believe
that it is imperative that these pastors be allowed to dialog and interact
with new Christian understandings that are emerging from modern biblical
scholarship. Jesus Seminar scholars are very clear that the Christian
theology of the future and the future of the Christian faith to mediate
the sacred in the post-modern world will emerge from those who are
ministering day by day in the trenches. It will not come from academia.
Unless
our pastors are freed from the shackles that keep them in silent bondage
to a primitive understanding of the Jesus of history, the church will
continue to lose it's ability to speak to a 21st century culture. The
more the old metaphors lose their ability to heal and have meaning,
the more vocal and extremist the fundamentalist are becoming. The Jesus
of history is increasingly becoming separated from the Christ of faith.
His words and his message must become the bedrock as the theology of
the Christian faith is reinterpreted for the 21st century.
The
era of religious totalitarianism must be relegated to history. The
world needs religions that embrace a tolerant, inclusive middlepath
theology. It is my hope, that I, and those who gather in dialog at
the Stonyhill Institute, can be a part of this important and exciting
new future. A relevant Christian theology re-visioned for the 21st
century.
APPENDIX:
A BRIEF SUMMARY OF MY BELIEVES ABOUT GOD, PRAYER, THE BIBLE, AND
JESUS AT THIS POINT IN MY JOURNEY:
1)
MY UNDERSTANDING OF GOD:
- God is not a human
like being who lives out there somewhere and keeps tabs on us.
- God is the creator
of all things.
- God is present
in all creation.
- God poured itself
into it's creation. Therefore everything in creation is sacred. There
is no part of creation that can be profane or not sacred. Everything
is One. Everything is ceremony.
- God is hard to
see when people approach with the judgment and conflict that comes
when one is armed with THE truth.
- God does not fiddle
with creation, but always works to bring redemption out of all things
through the energy of love, compassion, healing, creation, and consciousness..
- God does not tinker,
free will is free will.
- God limited its
power when humans were given the gift of consciousness. With the
gift of free will and consciousness, we became co-creators of this
universe with God. The gift of consciousness means that we are responsible
for what we create.
- God does not get
in the way of what we choose to create.
- God does not get
in the way of consequences. When we create pain and suffering,
- God grieves, but
does not interfere.
- God is ultimate
consciousness. There is no form (creation) without consciousness.
- God is love therefore
love and compassion manifest God.
- God is life therefore
we should live into our full humanity.
- God is the Ground
of All Being therefore we need to become the fully human beings we
were created to be.
- God is paradox.
Therefore God is both the unity of all things, and the diversity
of all creation.
- God is I AM. The "i
am" we call our soul is simply the "I AM" of the Creator of the Universe
that resides in each of us.
2) MY UNDERSTANDING
OF PRAYER:
- Prayer is learning
to listen to God.
- Prayer is openness.
The only prayer that makes sense to me is "thy will be done".
- The purpose of
prayer is not instant ego wish gratification.
- The purpose of
prayer is to increase the love, the compassion, the healing, our
self-awareness, our self-consciousness, the emptiness of our minds,
forgiveness, service to others, justice, and ultimately, to promote
non-violence in our universe.
- Prayer uses the
consciousness and creative energy of God in the ongoing creation
of the universe.
- The purpose of
prayer is co-creation. Through prayer and the gift of human consciousness
we are co-creators with God and as such are responsible with God
for the on-going creation of this universe.
- Thru prayer, God
influences us with his love and compassion. We are always being called
to God, prayer is the act of listening to God calling us to love
and compassion.
- Every choice and
every action is a prayer.
- There is positive
prayer and negative prayer.
- Positive prayer
is behavior and choices that promote love and compassion.
- Positive prayer
is emptiness of ego.
- Negative prayer
is behavior and choices that create conflict, pain and suffering.
- Negative prayer
is the black and white thinking of the ego which creates categories
and labels of "otherness".
- All prayer is
driven by our thought process and the beliefs of our own egos.
- We co-create with
God through positive prayer and negative prayer. This is true whether
our behaviors and choices are conscious or unconscious.
- Positive prayer
which creates compassion and love require that we be self-conscious
and empty of ego.
- Positive prayer
is created on the middlepath and leads to healing, openness, creativity,
love, compassion, unity, and becoming fully human.
- Positive prayer
works with life/God.
- Negative prayer
is created in human ego and leads to wounding, closed, non-creative
certainty, categories of otherness, judgment, rejection, divisive,
and fear.
- Negative prayer
works against life/God.
- Prayers of thanksgiving,
intercessory prayers and petitionary prayers can be very caring and
compassionate but prayer cannot be a demand or a request for a theistic
deity out there somewhere to do our bidding.
- Prayer is descending
to that deepest part of who we are as pure being, and then listening
with full consciousness and attention to the music coming from our
soul.
3) MY UNDERSTANDING
OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE:
- The bible is comprised
of non-literalistic stories that contain deep human metaphoric truths.
It cannot be read or understood in a literal sense or the wisdom
and meaning of the metaphor is lost. We can only approach scripture
with the openness to say, "I don't know if it happened this way or
not, but I know that it is true."
- The bible is a
human product, not a diving product. The bible describes ancient
Israel's and the early Jesus movement's way of understanding God.
A literal interpretation of stories and metaphors would have made
no sense for the ancient culture it was written for, and it makes
even less sense for us to literally interpret these ancient stories
and metaphors for a 21st century culture.
- The bible is a
lens. It points to God through story and metaphor. It is the mediator
of the sacred so that the sacred becomes present to us in our finite
humanity.
- The bible is not
in itself a holy or sacred text any more than Jesus was holy or sacred.
- When we read the
bible, it is clear that Jesus taught his disciples to pay attention
to God, not to him. Jesus was not a Christian.
- The bible is not
a blueprint on how to get to heaven. It's purpose is to help us through
stories and metaphor to become co-creators with God so as to transform
this life that we living right here and now and fill it with love,
compassion and justice.
- The bible is a
guide on how to become responsible co-creators with God in the on-going
creation of this universe.
4) MY UNDERSTANDING
OF JESUS
- Jesus was fully
human. He did not bodily rise to heaven on the third day, and he
was not born of a virgin. Those are mythic stories of how the early
Jesus movement saw Jesus. To have "spiritual authority" in ancient
cultures, one had to be born of a virgin, rise into the heavens and
have a working relationship with a God. Without these three criteria,
you couldn't join the club. Thus early Christian writers had to use
these metaphors to establish Jesus' authority as an important spiritual
figure.
- Jesus taught us
that the purpose of life is not getting to heaven. He was clear that
salvation is available to us right here. All we have to do is wake
up. We are living in the kingdom of God. He was clear that the kingdom
of God is present.
- Jesus taught that
the purpose of life is co-creation and transformation in this life
so as to become all we are capable of becoming. · Jesus systematically
tore down the walls and beliefs that created labels and categories
of "otherness". Thus, any belief that creates judgmental labels or
categories of "other" is profoundly anti-Jesus and thus anti-Christian.
This would include the sovereignty of Christ as the only Savior.
The only way to eternal life. The only way to heaven.
- The historical
Jesus must be understood apart from the Christology of the early
church The pre-Easter Jesus is not the same Jesus as the metphorized
post-Easter Christ of faith. Unless we keep them separate, we risk
losing them both. In other words, the Jesus of history is dead and
therefore irrelevant, and the post-Easter Jesus is dead and in heaven.
All we can do is be obedient and wait for him to come back. The historical
Jesus is available to us if we can discover him and separate him
from the ancient metaphoric stories of the risen Christ.
- Jesus was a remarkable
human being but he did not have the power of God, nor did he have
the mind of God. Like Beethoven in music and Van Goth in art, Jesus
(in the words of William James in his book The Varieties of Religious
Experience) was a spiritual genius.
- Jesus taught us
what the life of a person full of God might look like. Thus the early
Christian movement used metaphors like messiah, lamb of god, word
of god, wisdom of god, son of god, etc. to describe the sense of
holiness that surrounded him.
5) WHAT DO I MEAN
BY MIDDLE PATH THEOLOGY: (See diagram #2)
- Middlepath means
knowing that the walls and labels that create "other" are the source
of conflict, pain and suffering. · Middlepath means eliminating the
walls built out of the ideas, beliefs, and certainties of our egos.
Jesus tore down the walls that divided people from one another.
- The middle path
is learning to be with reality and experience reality directly.
- Middlepath is
emptiness. Emptiness is non-ego.
- Middle path means
knowing that there are no absolute truths in this finite world, only
relative truths. Jesus did not ask people to change before he broke
bread with them. He encouraged them to grow.
- When we walk the
middlepath, we live without certainty. We see our beliefs as illusions.
Our understand that our beliefs are only concepts about reality.
Reality can only be experienced. Thus God can only be experienced.
The moment we use words to describe God or reality, we are back into
illusion. The is true also for truth, love, and beauty.
- Walking the middlepath
is learning to live with gray, paradox, and uncertainty. Walter Bruggerman
said " there is great danger in domesticating mystery with excessive
certitude".
- Middlepath spirituality
is learning to live with what is, not what our egos think should
be.
- Walking the middlepath
is learning to give up resistance to living in the here and now.
The past is no more and the future is not yet. The only reality,
the only place where we can experience the Kingdom of God is now,
in this moment. This is called being awake.
- Walking the middlepath
is embracing our human finiteness. God is always just beyond the
horizon. We can journey toward God but as we do, the horizon recedes.
We can never see past the horizon.
- On the middlepath,
we learn to own our own feelings and beliefs as our own. As humans
we possess only relative truth, not absolute truth.
- Walking the middlepath
means knowing that no one can make us feel anything that is not already
inside us. Others can only remind us of feelings we have already
experienced.
- Middlepath spirituality
means that God is experienced only in the silence and in the attitude
of listening.
- Middlepath means
we become compassion. We do not "do" compassion. Compassion, unity,
and love are found only on the middlepath. Compassion and love are
not a thing or skill we achieve or learn, they are simply who we
already are. They emerge naturally as we become self-aware and empty
ourselves of our ego beliefs and certainties.
- The middlepath
is a place of equality, diversity, tolerance, humility, non-violent
relationships, and justice. The human ego creates categories of power.
The ego struggles to be right, good, in control. Any one or any thing
that does not conform to the beliefs of our ego, are seen as a threat.
The ego labels them as "other" or "them". Ego is based on the concept
of survival of the fittest
- The middlepath
is a attitude of vulnerability.
- Middlepath is
a place of dialogue. Compassionate community is built on dialogue.
The ego thrives on monologue.
- Middlepath is
unity and oneness. There is no "otherness" on the middlepath because
there is no ego. There is only emptiness and pure experience.
- The middlepath
is a place of not knowing. It is the absolute gray between the black
and white categories of the human ego. If one person's ego is yellow
and the other persons ego is blue, the middlepath is green. There
is truth in everything because everything was created by the Creator.
- To walk the middle
path is to walk on sacred ground. Everything in creation is sacred.
Thus everything is ceremony. It is important to remember that truth
is paradox. All creation is sacred and we cannot walk on ground that
is not sacred, but there is no middlepath. One can only grow towards
a life lived on the middlepath. To reach the middlepath is to become
God.
- The middlepath
is paradox. It is a place of absolute truth and a place of not knowing
and uncertainty. The middlepath is both absolute emptiness and total
diversity. The middle path is the unchanging ground of being, and
a place of on-going change and creativity because creation requires
a process of flexibility and change. Without change, there can be
no creativity. The ego struggles against change. Beliefs, opinions,
and certainties thrive on unchanging rigidity and inflexibility.
Thus the ego struggles against the reality of God. This is call being
asleep.
- The middlepath
is inclusive. The ego thrives on exclusive. Me. Mine. Us. Them.
- The middle path
is pro-active. The beliefs of black and white thinking are reactive.
- Middlepath is
right hemisphere. Only story, myth, metaphor, empathy, and meaning
are found on the middlepath. They reflect the heart wisdom of the
soul. Facts are left hemisphere objects found and studied by the
ego at the outer boundaries of black and white thinking. They reflect
the intellect of the mind.
- The middlepath
is the Pure Consciousness of the Creator. There is no form (creation)
without consciousness. Middlepath is consciousness.
- The middlepath
is a place of learning to pay attention, becoming self-aware, and
self-conscious. This is called enlightenment. It is the ability to
live life fully awake.
- Middlepath is
spiritual growth. Spiritual growth is simply awakening to what is,
rather than what the ego thinks "should" be.
- Middlepath is
awakening. The middlepath is the source of Consciousness and awakening.
Sin is a lack of awareness; being asleep and trapped in the ego.
Sin is unconsciousness. Sin is ignorance.
- Middlepath is
light. Light is sharing in the consciousness and free will of the
Creator as fully responsible co-creators. The light of co-creation
is found in our own hearts. What we choose to look at will be in
the light. What we choose to ignore will remain in the darkness.
Darkness is the other side of what is known.. The darkness has a
purpose, it exists to be transformed into light. The light that will
give birth to a new creation can only come from our own hearts.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Alan Cohen, The
Dragon Doesn't Live Here Anymore: Loving Fully Living Freely, New
Leaf, Atlanta, Ga., 1981
The Jesus Seminar,
The Once and Future Jesus, Polebridge Press, 2000 Terence Grant,
The Silence of Unknowing: The Key to the Spiritual Life, Triumph
Books, 1989
J. Krishnamurti,
Freedom from the Known, HarperSanFrancisco,1969
Sheldon B. Kopp,
If You Meet The Buddha On The Road, Kill Him, Bantam Books, 1972
The Jesus Seminar,
The Once and Future Faith, Polebridge Press, 2001
John Welwood, Awakening
The Heart: East/West Approaches to Psychotherapy and The Healing
Relationship, New Science Library, 1983
Frances Vaughan,
The Inward Arc: Healing in Psychotherapy and Spirituality, Blue Dolphin
Press, 2nd Edition 1995
Mark Epstein, Thoughts
Without A Thinker, Basic Books, 1995
Elmar R Gruber, & Holger
Kersten, The Original Jesus, The Buddhist Sources of Christianity,
Element Books Limited, 1995
Catherine de Hueck
Doherty, Poustinia, Ave Maria Press, 1975
Marcus J. Borg,
Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus and
the Heart of Contemporary Faith, Harper Collins, 1994
James P. Carse,
The Silence of God, Harper Collins, 1995
Barbara Marx Hubbard,
Conscious Evolution, New World Library, 1998
Anthony DeMello,
Awareness, Image Books Doubleday, 1992
Mary Oliver, New
and Selected Poems, Beacon Press, 1992
Russell Shorto,
Gospel Truth: The New Image of Jesus Emerging from Science and History,
and Why It Matters, Riverhead Books, 1997
Burton L. Mack,
The Lost Gospel: The Book of Q and Christian Origins, Harper Collins,
1993
Eknath Easwaran,
Ghandi The Man, Nilgiri Press, 3rd Edition 1997 Parabola, Volume
26, No.2m, Summer 2001
Tom Harpur, The
Thinking Person's Guide to God: Overcoming the Obstacles to Belief,
Prima Publishing, 1996
Arthur J. Deikman,
M.D., The Observing Self: Mysticism and Psychotherapy, Beacon Press,
1982
M. Scott Peck,
M.D., The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace, Simon & Schuster,
1987
|